Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26
Without that Militia phrase, we would never have these Court fights.

I agree.....the logic behind the Amendment is a militia can't exist without arms....one regulates the militia but not the arms....

53 posted on 11/09/2007 5:56:10 AM PST by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: cbkaty
They meant well-regulated in that the militiamen would be well-trained. I don't think it meant regulated by the federal government. That's why they have a standing military.
81 posted on 11/09/2007 6:38:35 AM PST by wastedyears (One Marine vs. 550 consultants. Sounds like good odds to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: cbkaty

...and a militia is by definition “of the people”, and not a select group chosen by the government.


101 posted on 11/09/2007 7:24:19 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: cbkaty

“one regulates the militia but not the arms....”

And if one looks at “regulated” in the context of the time the 2nd Ammendment was written, one sees that the definition as explained by the founding fathers was the same as a “well regulated” timepiece. That is, “regulated” does NOT mean “restricted”, as is sometimes claimed by our detractors, but rather “kept in good working order or tuned”.
I will see if I can find the founding fathers citations on this. I have read it before, but don’t have time (at work right now) to look it up. If anyone can help....have at it.


158 posted on 11/09/2007 8:51:06 AM PST by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson