Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sig226

Also if they rule on it favorable the NRA loses it funding from Joe citizen who was scared they would take his guns.


338 posted on 11/09/2007 12:59:24 PM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Resolute Conservative; Blood of Tyrants

I think that yours and Blood of Tyrants’ sentiments are just plain wrong. Even if the court did decide that the second amendment means what it says, do you think the Schumers and Bradys of the world would somehow find reason and stop what they are doing? I don’t. They’re weasels and if the Supreme Court issued a ruling against assault weapons bans and handgun bans, they’d pass another law in a state like California and try to get a district friendly to them to impose it on the rest of us.

If you really think that the National Rifle Association is just out to fleece people, ask Larry Pratt and Aaron Zelman if they agree with you. Both of them think that NRA is the big gorilla, no matter how much they might disagree with NRA’s stand on some issues. And to suggest that NRA doesn’t do anything is to deny the RTC and Stand Your Ground revolution in this country. NRA was the biggest supporter of that. What they accomplished was a near miracle.


443 posted on 11/09/2007 5:44:12 PM PST by sig226 (New additions to the list of democrat criminals - see my profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson