Replies

Yes, but it is also an admission that nobody knows how to interpret a simple statement of fact and that we need an outsider to explain it to us. Further, that in so doing, we would go along with what they said it means, beings we believe in the rule of law. I realize the temptation is great to allow the SCOTUS to do that in this instance.

Especially dangerous in this case, as we are allowing at least four potential slaveowners on the court to help consider the re-institution of slavery, for if freedom, self-defense and equality were established and re-inforced out of the barrel of a gun, to take the guns away would pave the way for the re-institution of slavery. A new kind of slavery that would make ALL the people slaves to a tyrannical government. We are already half-way there anyway, with our current tax system and money system.

Yes, there is a danger here that should be considered.

Further, that in so doing, we would go along with what they said it means, beings we believe in the rule of law.

I only support the rule of Law insofar as it is supported by the Constitution. "Judges of every State shall be bound thereby"... Say what you want about the SCOTUS being Federal, but it's a dodge. If the SCOTUS doesn't uphold the lower courts refutation of the ban on individual RKBA grounds, then we no longer have a Republic and Rule .308 is a viable option.

We are MORE than half-way there. For a number of reasons. Allowing them to attempt to draw our "Liberty Teeth" is a back breaking straw for many...

A new kind of slavery that would make ALL the people slaves to a tyrannical government. We are already half-way there anyway,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Half-way? What is halfway between Buffalo and Key West, Miami?