Scalia said nothing about § 311 or the composition of the militia, and you haven’t explained why Crips and Bloods are exempt from that law. I called you here to gloat because Scalia used the same reasoning I did w/respect to Miller when I sarcastically asked whether Miller was in a militia.
I thought gloating would be fun, because I figured you would know that your side lost in the Heller case. What I have found is much more interesting and amusing - you have adopted the individual rights position as if you held it all along. It’s kind of like you have some Orwellian internal mandate that whatever the current position of the government is, it must be right, and it must always have been right, and it must always have been your position. Doublethink in action. Just fascinating stuff. Keep it up!
He said militia membership had nothing to do with the right to keep and bear arm. Your "Crips are militia" theory of gun rights is now both absurd and meaningless.
Poor you.