Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
Let's try again. Was Scalia talking about Miller in that quotation? It's a yes or no kind of question.

And if you insist on dredging up yet another unanswered question, I'll ask you again: do you see any exemption in TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 311 for Crips and Bloods?
1,401 posted on 06/28/2008 7:13:58 PM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1398 | View Replies ]


To: publiusF27
Was Scalia talking about Miller in that quotation?

Scalia refuted your position that militia membership was a prerequisite to the right to keep and bear arms. He noted that Miller was silent on the question.

Do you have targets painted on your feet?

1,404 posted on 06/28/2008 7:17:22 PM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1401 | View Replies ]

To: publiusF27
do you see any exemption in TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 311 for Crips and Bloods?

Unconvicted Crips and Bloods have 2nd Amendment rights, just like the rest of us who have not been convicted of any crime

One underlying point about "unconvicted Crips" is the presumption that they are criminals who just have not yet been convicted of any of the crimes they have surely performed, particularly since it seems that committing a crime is part of the gang initiation process

The solution is to catch, convict, and incarcerate or execute them. The bottom line is that anybody who is too dangerous to be allowed to own a gun, is too dangerous to be loose on the street

1,426 posted on 06/29/2008 8:06:01 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1401 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson