Did you already forget your contention that Crips and Bloods are militia?
Frequent use has that effect.
What causes continuing to argue an irrelevant point after it's been rendered moot?
I have already pointed out where you said gun rights depend on militia membership at post 1199. You repeated it at post 1203. Now show me even one post where I said it.
And no, pointing out that the law (saying the unorganized militia is composed of all males 17 to 45 and female members of the Guard) might apply to Crips and Bloods is not the same as saying their gun rights depend on militia membership.
Lemme guess... is it opposite day? ;-)