Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: publiusF27
"Miller did not hold that and cannot possibly be read to have held that." --Scalia

Thanks for shooting yourself in the foot. You really should read your quotes before posting them.

1,365 posted on 06/28/2008 7:43:30 AM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1364 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave

Stupidest post I’ve seen on this board. Just because Scalia thinks that Stevens’ reading of Miller is impossible does not mean that he doesn’t share my view that if the Supreme Court had thought that Miller’s non-membership in a militia was relevant, they would have used it to toss the case before even reaching the question of whether a short barreled shotgun was a militia weapon. He clearly does share that view, which you called question begging.


1,366 posted on 06/28/2008 11:04:34 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson