Thanks for shooting yourself in the foot. You really should read your quotes before posting them.
Stupidest post I’ve seen on this board. Just because Scalia thinks that Stevens’ reading of Miller is impossible does not mean that he doesn’t share my view that if the Supreme Court had thought that Miller’s non-membership in a militia was relevant, they would have used it to toss the case before even reaching the question of whether a short barreled shotgun was a militia weapon. He clearly does share that view, which you called question begging.