Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: budwiesest
"Assuming as you do (that states may dictate rules regarding keeping and bearing of arms) this clause would undermine the lack of uniformity among the states ( shall-issue, may-issue, concealed vs open carry) as now displayed."

It would. Your example demonstrates that the second amendment does not apply to the states -- if it did, equal protection and due process would demand that the laws be uniform.

"Since they are not limited in what they may regulate (your notion) why haven't the folks at Commerce cracked-down on the lack of 'uniformity' in this regard?"

Well, the Commerce Clause gives Congres the power. It doesn't mean that Congress must exercise the power.

1,347 posted on 11/25/2007 6:15:27 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1343 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Your example demonstrates that the second amendment does not apply to the states -- if it did, equal protection and due process would demand that the laws be uniform.

What is with this obsession they have for uniformity and centralization? They're pushing ideas that are the polar opposites of those stated by the Founding Fathers.

1,351 posted on 11/25/2007 7:39:45 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson