Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
The case had nothing to do with the language of the BoR or its scope.

Really? So her ruling on "carry" definitions has nothing at all to do with "keeping and bearing arms"?

1,241 posted on 11/19/2007 6:11:39 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1228 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
"So her ruling on "carry" definitions has nothing at all to do with "keeping and bearing arms"?"

Only if you think "carry" is the same as "bear".

Did the Founding Fathers think that? Should we put a modern interpretation on "bear" or should we go with original meaning?

1,245 posted on 11/19/2007 7:13:54 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson