[publiusF27]

And if the U.S. Supreme Court says "to bear arms" does not include carrying them around, then what? How is that in our benefit over what we have today?

It wouldn't be a benefit or a detriment to me. It would be exactly the situation I'm in today. The second amendment doesn't currently protect any of my guns, nor the uses to which I put them.

[robertpaulsen]

"It wouldn't be a benefit or a detriment to me. It would be exactly the situation I'm in today."

You wouldn't say that about Kelo. Why would you say it about guns?