Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
The decision you're promoting explicitly excepts concealed carry from 2nd Amendment protection.

The question before the court is "collective" vs "individual" Right and if the Second can be used as a defense against such legislation.

Plainly, it can. The Second Amendment should be an affirmative defense in all cases regarding individual ownership and carry of arms. Regardless of which State, colony, or district of the US they live in. As it was designed to be.

You aren't even paying attention to the argument are you? You just read off the list of Brady approved arguing points... and go along your merry way.

1,210 posted on 11/18/2007 7:11:40 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1209 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
The question before the court is "collective" vs "individual" Right

And you're promoting the view that concealed carry is not an individual right under the 2nd Amendment and that it may be banned nationally, abrogating all state laws protecting that right.

If the dress fits, don't be afraid to wear it, Sarah.

1,211 posted on 11/18/2007 7:21:08 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1210 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse

Twisting words is a critical job skill in DC. It’s been raised to an art form by the professionals.


1,212 posted on 11/18/2007 7:32:16 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson