How does ruling the Second an inalienable individual Right do that? As I stated, only active duty militia could be "regulated" in how they could carry arms. No general ban could be implemented.
Have you tried to get your carry permit in Cali? Unless you are politically connected... Good Luck. So much for your idiot "State laws" protecting sh&t...
Under an individual Right, you could tell Babs Boxer and DiFi to get bent...
The decision you're promoting explicitly excepts concealed carry from 2nd Amendment protection. You centralized government freaks are so transparent.
An inalienable individual Right to do what?
Oh, you say, "An inalienable individual Right to keep and bear arms". Fine. And if the U.S. Supreme Court says "to bear arms" does not include carrying them around, then what? How is that in our benefit over what we have today?