Another example of liberals not being able to see the consequences of their actions. Suppose guns or even just handguns are outlawed. What happens next? Look at DC where handguns are already outlawed. I think we have more murders in our nations capitol than in Baghdad every day. Liberals need to play more chess, where a stupid move will get you killed. Maybe they could learn from that.
Imagine being a land owner on the Texas / Mexican border.....and being unarmed.
The Coyotes and drug runners are being protected by heavily armed Zetas and Mexican military...that actually escort the loads deep within Texas territory, not to mention the rape trees, dirty diapers, and garbage they leave behind on the property...and the theft from outbuildings...and kidnapings, etc.
70 missing in the Laredo area alone.... In DC, all one has to fear is the local public sckrooled citizenry...
It’s not that bad in DC - but the murder rate in New Orleans very well might be.
DC’s petition reads like a chess player hoping his opponent won’t see his very weak position.
Then they have to collect them.
Liberals need to play more chess, where a stupid move will get you killed.
My comment and this sentence are more closely related than anyone expects.
If you look at the last election they do not have the power in their conference to pass this type of legislation. If every republlican was unable to vote they do not have 3/3 of their own on board.. there are a number of pro gun Dem's that came in in the last election.
Can you recess appoint a Supreme? There is still over a year left we may get one more shot at a nomination that is really what Shumer has been after the AG for, why he drove out the last one why they fought this one so hard..
This is the battle of our time, of all time. If we lose the 2nd amendment the rest are meaningless.
The may win all 3 next year they may not but there is no way on earth they will have all guns out of private hands by 2012 or 2022 or 2052....