Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
We also note that at least three current members (and one former member) of the Supreme Court have read "bear Arms" in the Second Amendment to have meaning beyond mere soldiering: "Surely a most familiar meaning [of 'carries a firearm'] is, as the Constitution's Second Amendment ('keepand bear Arms') and Black's Law Dictionary . . . indicate: 'wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person." Muscarello v. United States, 524 U.S. 125, 143 (1998) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting, joined by Rehnquist, C.J., Scalia, J.,and Souter, J.) (emphasis in original). Based on the foregoing, we think the operative clause includes a private meaning for"bear Arms."
1,162 posted on 11/18/2007 8:41:43 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1160 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
That says absolutely nothing about "BoR protected Right was ruled being off limits to both the Feds and the States."

Since you bluff everytime, I always know that it's safe to call your hand.

1,164 posted on 11/18/2007 8:46:20 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson