Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
Nunn held that 2nd Amendment protections don't apply to concealed weapons.

Read it again. It says that if the legislation stopped at forbidding concealed carry only, it would have been "legal". But that since it forbid all carry, that it was against the Constitutions Second Amendment protections and void.

1,150 posted on 11/18/2007 8:01:11 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1148 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
It says that if the legislation stopped at forbidding concealed carry only, it would have been "legal".

So Congress may impose a national concerned carry ban pursuant to the 2nd Amendment, by your "logic". No wonder you and Sarah hate state laws so much. They stand in the way of your dream of centralized power imposed by judicial fiat.

1,154 posted on 11/18/2007 8:20:05 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson