So, in your opinion, the RKBA in the second amendment can be declared an individual right, but not declared a fundamental individual right?
If that's the case, then the strict scrutiny test cannot be used; at least the way I read it.
No, you misunderstood. I think it might be declared that the 2a protects a fundamental right, and it might be incorporated and used against state gun control laws, and I really don’t see what would be so bad about that.
It’s true that future rulings could also validate state and federal gun control laws, but isn’t that already happening? To ask the question another way, when was the last time someone successfully mounted a 2A challenge to any law? It hasn’t happened, and won’t any time soon, unless the Heller case changes things.