Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
BUT, I'm saying the second amendment doesn't do that today. Futhermore, even if the Heller court rules it an individual right for every citizen, that still won't put an M-16 in every household.

It's a step along the way. Do you see any potential benefits to having the SC hear the Heller case?
1,045 posted on 11/17/2007 3:28:18 AM PST by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1034 | View Replies ]


To: publiusF27
"Do you see any potential benefits to having the SC hear the Heller case?"

Only the one I mentioned: If they find that the second amendment protects an individual right and they don't incorporate.

Since that decision only affects DC residents and still allows the federal government to regulate their weapons and require registration, it's a very small benefit.

Nowhere near what there is to lose.

Do you see it any differently?

1,052 posted on 11/17/2007 5:15:36 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1045 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson