1) You're admitting that you believe that unborn babies are not persons.
2) That belief means that you agree with Blackmun, and the substance of Roe vs. Wade.
You may want to make them this, and I can see why you want to do that, but this is an idea that is born of emotion, and is ultimately extraordinarily unwise.
A) A typical liberal tactic: Accuse those you can't out-argue of emotionalism.
B) You're the one basing your arguments on something other than knowledge, logic and reason. In fact, your arguments amount to little more than an affirmation of ancient myths about human development in the womb, not on modern scientific understanding based in the clear evidence from DNA that human life can only be identified as beginning at ONE point: The point and moment of conception.
C) Your definition of wisdom is spurious. How wise can it be to kill your posterity, or empower those who do so?
A. You are beyond reason, there IS no arguing with you. You haven’t out-argued anyone at all.
B. I’m not arguing anything at all about science, knowledge or morality. I’m only pointing out what the law is.
C. I’m not advocating the “killing of my posterity”. That’s nonsense and really, a lie on your part. I’m only pointing out that there is more involved in investing fetuses with legal “personhood” than your simplisic world view seems to be able to grasp.
I have to ask myself: How do I let myself get dragged into these unproductive, sophomoric, pointless exchanges?