Yes, exactly! However, not everyone believes that a fetus is a somebody I happen to believe it and you I'm assuming you do as well. But here's the rub, not everyone believes the same as you and I and we have to deal with that reality or we get nowhere. And our (well, not mine) efforts to use government to dictate behavioral change becomes just as off-putting as their efforts to be selfish and/or in denial.
You make a lot of assumptions considering you don't know what I am an advocate of or for.
Well, I know that you believe that homosexuality and abortion are two things that we should not be tolerant of and that both plague our society. I'll agree on one of those with you but I certainly do not see homosexuality, by itself, as a behavior we should seek to become intolerant of.
By the way, do you advocate for adoption and for providing financial incentives to mothers of the unborn who contemplate abortion? More so than your advocacy in deriding homosexuality, say?
My biggest single issue is the 2nd amendment.
Good! Mine just happens to be liberty, in general.
Having it be illegal for women to kill their children just seems logical to me.
Let's be real clear here...no one is talking about children that have already healthily exited the womb. The issue here is that some women do not view the life of a fetus as a living child or they are too selfish to admit to or acknowledge that there is life. We should encourage these women to go through with their pregnancies rather than legislating their beliefs at the federal level. Heck, you'd even be better off passing a state law that establishes a legal birth at the very moment a pregnancy is discovered, issue a valid birth certificate, and have that 'birth' be fully protected by the 14th amendment.
Have you witnessed my supposed public displays of outrage or my "piousness"?
Yes, piousness, toward homosexuals, in fact.
Are you really even typing at me or some archetype you have created?
Both. Don't we all post so that the interactive experience is shared and discussion can evolve by many participants? I know that that's one of the reasons I post.
Do you really think that allowing women to kill their children furthers the concept of liberty?
I've covered this above but forcing them to submit to beliefs that you and I happen to share when the area is a very gray one to many, is not a concept of liberty either.
Men and Women aren't free unless they don't have deal with the consequences of their actions?
And you're assuming that there are no consequences for deciding to abort? Don't you believe in Judgment Day?
Women aren't free unless they can kill their child because having it would be an big inconvienence?
I do not understand this question.
Liberty comes with responsibility it isn't freedom from responsibility.
No, it does not. Liberty comes with consequences for making inappropriate decisions, not cooperating with others, and for intruding on the liberty of others.
How freedom to murder unborn babies became a basic tenent of liberty I'll never know.
It isn't. It's a gray area where not everyone sees the same thing.