Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYFreeper

“C-130, F-16N, T-38 to name a few.”

None of those can take off or land on a Carrier. There’s a proposal to put floats on a C-130 and try it out as a seaplane, but it went nowhere. The Navy only uses the T-38 in its test pilot school. The F-16N is only used for aggressor training.

“Although it didn’t make it to the front lines, the YF-17 morphed into the F-18.”

True, but the resulting aircraft was totally different. The YF-17 was actually a better (and faster) pure fighter in my opinion, but totally unsuited to carrier ops with its light airframe design. There’s a reason they gave the Hornet a different designation....it was a new airplane, similar in appearance only.

On a side note, I always thought USAF and Navy should have bought a small run of F-17’s (maybe 150 or so) for aggressor training.


354 posted on 11/05/2007 8:03:40 AM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]


To: DesScorp
None of those can take off or land on a Carrier.

Huh??

C-130 on a carrier

True, but the resulting aircraft was totally different.

No different from the FJ-1 Fury to the F-86 Saber.

359 posted on 11/05/2007 9:19:45 AM PST by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

To: DesScorp

“None of those can take off or land on a Carrier.”

They landed a C-130 on a carrier

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBDAfG4nX5s


363 posted on 11/05/2007 10:04:28 AM PST by 2CAVTrooper (ron paul is the antichrist, he has a slick message and has duped the feeble minded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson