Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan

Actually, unifying all branches of the armed forces does not follow logically from the author’s argument. He clearly states that the USAF was originally a part of the ARMY and became a seperate branch after a desire to gain prestige.


311 posted on 11/03/2007 6:11:33 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: ffusco
He clearly states that the USAF was originally a part of the ARMY and became a seperate branch after a desire to gain prestige.

In which he is pushing his own agenda. I'm certain that we would not be best served with the strategic nuclear mission and space missions under Army command (no bad on the Army, but these programs need their own focused approach).

I think the issue of whether the Army should have its own fixed wing attack aircraft is a good question.

328 posted on 11/04/2007 3:47:53 AM PST by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson