Replies

The key to the entire matter is Rushing’s claiming the rights to the station’s receivables as being his “to take as collateral in the loan”. He’s referring to a loan that he stupidly made to some people who LEASED the station previously and NEVER OWNED IT. His claim (supported by the prosecutor, one Lynn Switzer) that the loan agreement entitled him to the receivables is fraudulent in that:

a) the people who borrowed the money did not ever own the business and, as a result could NOT pledge someone else’s receivables as collateral in ANY loan agreement,

b) the loan agreement entitled Rushing and Shamrock EDC to “All inventory, fixtures, furniture, equipment now owned or hereafter acquired wherever located”. (This is NOT a “blanket claim” that would include receiveables which are an intangible and MUST be listed in order to be used as collateral. Also, the business receiveables must be OWNED by the person or persons taking out the loan in order to become a portion of the security.)

An EXACT COPY (scanned from the original) of the loan agreement is at http://www.shamrocktx.us/files/loan.pdf and I’ll challenge ANYONE to show us where it allows David Rushing, Shamrock EDC or anyone else to claim the receiveables of this or any radio station. (Of course, Lynn Switzer will try to tell you that Mr. Rushing had originally INTENDED for it to include the receivables but, due to his inexperience (or whatever excuse comes to mind on any given day), he FORGOT to add receiveables to the list. Still, the fact remains that the receiveables are NOT listed and COULD NOT be listed as the people with whom Rushing entered into the agreement DID NOT OWN THE BUSINESS. (He also SHOULD’VE verified ownership before agreeing to loan them money against the business EQUIPMENT, which Rushing still has in his possession to this very date).

Just about any time now, we can all expect “rushdot” to make an appearance and start proclaiming “there are two sides to the story” and “a jury returned a guilty verdict”, etc.

BE ADVISED: THAT VERDICT WAS BASED ON LIES THAT THE JURY WAS TOLD. IT WAS BASED ON RUSHING’S PERJURED TESTIMONY THAT WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY LYNN SWITZER’S FLAGRANT DISREGARD OF *TRUE* JUSTICE. (All of this is demonstrated inthe transcripts that are available for downloading and reading at http://www.shamrocktx.us/evidence.htm.)

When rushdot makes his apprearance, stick to one basic line of questioning and he will wither and die like so much rotten fruit:

a) If Rushing was so certain of his rights to claim the receiveables, why an ARMED ASSAULT on the station BEFORE any “foreclosure” was ever prepared and certainly before it was filed with the courts? (This is HIGHLY ILLEGAL.)

b) Why did Rushing and SEDC and company REFUSE to accept the cash payout of the loan (that wasn’t even mine to pay-off)?

c) Why did Rushing intentionally, willfully and maliciously STEAL the receiveables for months and divert them into an account controlled by himself in order to prevent our meeting station deadlines with regards to payment of bills?

d) Why did Rushing STEAL the station’s public file (required to be located at the station at all times) and relocate it to HIS OWN OFFICE and then complain to the FCC ON MANY OCCASIONS that we had NO public file when he unlawfully had it in HIS possession all along?

e) Why did Rushing go to any and all lengths to make it IMPOSSIBLE to operate the station from it’s licensed location and at it’s licensed parameters so that he could continue complaining (at a cost to me of THOUSANDS to defend against each complaint) when he knew all along that HE was the direct cause of each of the violations that he was complaining about?

f) Why will Rushing (even now) tell you that I “missed attending a hearing at the FCC offices” when he knows all along that I was UNCONSTITUTIONALLY HELD PRISONER AT THE TIME OF THAT HEARING? (See http://www.shamrocktx.us/courtofappeals.htm for details and evidence of this.)

g) Why was Rushing ALLOWED TO LIE AND AIDED IN HIS LIES TO A JURY BY A PROSECUTOR CLAIMING TO REPRESENT THE “GREAT” STATE OF TEXAS?

Wait and watch: When “rushdot” makes his appearance, the story will be “You should see what the jury saw.” Well, I submit to you that the evidence IS POSTED and YOU CAN SEE IT. The transcripts are also posted and YOU CAN READ THEM ALONG WITH RUSHING’S OBVIOUS LIES AND SELF-CONTRADICTIONS.

Please, don’t allow these thieves to get away with this. If they *DO* manage to set a precedent with this criminal conspiracy, there will be NO business (or home, for that matter) that will be safe from “foreclosure at gunpoint without benefit of a hearing” when someone claims that someone (before you) MIGHT owe them some money and, as a result, they’re walking in and taking what is YOURS.

Had these acts been carried out AFTER a court proceeding or AFTER a foreclosure had even been PREPARED (let alone FILED), I could see that it MIGHT be possible. However, NONE of this is the case. These people walked in, unannounced, on a Monday that was just like any other Monday (while they were still smiling to my face and leading me to believe that they were willing to accept a CASH PAYOFF of the outstanding amount the other people owed and this was NOT out of the question as there was NO foreclosure in the works at the time) and THREATENED THE LIVES OF MY WIFE AND TWO (under ten-years old) LITTLE GIRLS. Our children still have nightmares of “the day the bad people took our clothes and toys”. (Rushing and company seemed to get a particular thrill out of stealing the children’s toys...)

Something needs to be done in order to publicize this matter and to bring the facts to light.

Richard James Roach was only the tip of the iceburg. Sharon Lynn Switzer is, if anything, even more insidious, evil and corrupt than her predecessor. In my own personal opinion, she shows as much interest in serving justice as Charles Manson. But then, I’ve heard her say that she can’t back down now because she was ordered to railroad me by Roach and backing down would only open her precious ofice up to more investigations and she “doesn’t think the office of the district attorney can withstand another investigation.”

Hey, Lynn! If there’s nothing to hide, why fear another investigation? Actively aiding and abetting Rushing and company is just as criminal as what Roach had you doing. And, I will NOT stop until I see this through. (On the other hand, if I weren’t right and didn’t 100% of the proof that I say I have, I wouldn’t be ascerting these VERY TRUE claims publicly now, would I?)

Come on... Let’s see you pull another UNCONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULLINGout of that mini-skirt and do your worst with it! The world is waiting and watching in more ways than you know...