Testimonials are not evidence, and certainly not scientific evidence.
Testimonials are not necessarily even accurate.
If you want to do science, bring evidence.
Coyoteman, I must tell you that people like you who can’t see the “evidence” for intelligent design actually frighten me.
The simplest known living cell is perhaps more complex than all of man’s technology, and we are virtually clueless about how it could have come into existence by purely naturalistic, random mechanisms ... but you don’t see any “evidence” of ID.
And the idea that we understand how the evolution of complex organs occurred is nonsense.
Several months ago, I challenged someone here on FR to cite a peer-reviewed scientific paper explaining *in detail* how the human ear evolved or could have evolved.
What happened? Someone provided a link to a little three-page document that simply glossed over the problem at a very high level. But all evolutionists need is the slightest hint of plausibility, and they are satisfied that their theory is rock solid. They are absolutely deluded.
Oh, and some bozo here on FR snickered about how embarrassed I must be for not finding the three-page paper on the ear, as though the link even remotely answered my challenge. But that’s the kind of baloney that occurs constantly.
The slightest hint of plausibility is taken as a “mountain of evidence” in favor of Darwinian evolution, but *real* “mountains of evidence” for ID are casually dismissed with a wave of the hand.
People who cannot recognize the overwhelming evidence of ID in nature are frightening. You close your eyes and then proclaim that the world is dark, and no one can convince you otherwise. What scares me is what other absurdities you are willing to believe.