No. And you know better than to ask such a silly question.
Evolution deals with changes in the genome since the origin of life.
Here are five hypothesis regarding the origin of the first life forms.
b) Aliens from another planet and/or dimension travelled to this planet and -- deliberately or accidentally -- seeded the planet with the first life forms.
c) In the future, humans will develop a means to travel back in time. They will use this technology to plant the first life forms in Earth's past, making the existence of life a causality loop.
d) A divine agent of unspecified nature zap-poofed the first life forms into existence.
e) Any method other than the four described above led to the existence of the first life forms. Source
Saved me the trouble, AND did a better job than I had planned.
Mainstream science does, however has done a lot of productive research on the origin of life, and progress in recent years has been encouraging.
One minor thing that creationists seem unaware of is that replication and Darwinian evolution has been observed in naked RNA molecules — no cellular machinery or cell membrane at all.
And what is the alternative? Stop asking questions? stop being curious? Stop all research on the subject?
In your world of “science” in must be nice to be able to redefine theories whenever convienent or when something unconvienent challenges your theory. You obviously have no idea how complicated it is for life to come into being on its own, let alone complicated or intelligent life. Please, go back to school.
“Evolution deals with changes in the genome since the origin of life.” Even the great evolutionists of our day and history would laugh at that,