What does it take to be “terrorism-related” exactly, I wonder?
Voting for a liberal DemocRAT, for one!
“determined the incident was not terrorism-related.”
I bet this is based upon a conclusion that the perps are not Muslim. Probably the perps were afraid that someone else would try to hijack the plane, and they wanted to be prepared.
when they are actually used on a flight crew member.
a white male doing anything is deemed a terrorist....a patel carrying karate knives....come on man...you gotta be pc and multicultural sensitive!!!
They’re a little old and a little Hindu to be terrorists, maybe? Profiling, tsk.
Maybe just planned hijacking-for-profit, not politics.
Maybe just stupid. But you really have to work to be that stupid.
Mrs VS
>>What does it take to be terrorism-related exactly, I wonder?<<
They are probably not muslims...
Ah yes, well, one must scream "allah akbar" and "death to America, death to the infidels", while slashing anyone within reach AND drawing copious amounts of blood.
It is only “terrorism related” if AQ claims responsibility, maybe.
Investigators question them, and when the terrorist replies that "no, I am not a terrorist you infidel!", then they are deemed Not Terrrorists. That's how it works. NEXT!
How the #&^@*% do you pronounce Chhaganbhai ?