[colorcountry]

So which of the perps did she agree to have sex with? By your own recogning, he should only be charged with armed robbery.

That’s a pretty serious charge in itself and he could serve some very serious time.

[Red in Blue PA]

So gang rape is not really a crime?

Nice to hear that from someone who has Chist in their tagline.

[Enterprise]

"She went to a North Philadelphia home to meet the customer, who had agreed to pay her $150 for sex. He then said a friend was coming with the money, and that the friend would pay her another $100 for sex.

Instead, three other men arrived, and Gindraw pulled a gun and ordered the woman to have sex with all of them, she testified.

Someone can make a case that she "consented" to sex with one male, and perhaps two if the story of the friend who was going to bring another 100 dollars was to be believed. However, she was clearly forced at gunpoint to have sex with men she DID NOT agree to have sex with, and THAT is RAPE! Going by the statement she made, I think there are four counts of rape here. She was lured there with a promise of payment, and upon arrival she was told that there wouldn't BE any payment.

Nonetheless, as sportutegrl has pointed out, we need to wait for statements from the others involved, in the event this is another Duke case.

[pray4liberty]

So which of the perps did she agree to have sex with? By your own recogning, he should only be charged with armed robbery.

That’s a pretty serious charge in itself and he could serve some very serious time.

This judge knows what she's doing...the truth is, rape carries less of a judicial penalty than robbery or conspiracy. They will be locked up for far longer on those, than if the plaintiff won on the rape charges. The judge is looking at what will keep them off the street longer. It is an odd, but just ruling.