Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kregger1
It's not a Republican or it would be out already. You think they'd sit on a Rudy scandal? It is to laugh -- and what more exactly could Rudy do? You think they'd sit on a Mitt scandal? They'd be in ecstasy exposing the Mormon. It has to be a Democrat. It isn't Bill Clinton, because there's nothing more he could do in the smut area that would be that newsworthy. The most likely reason they haven't run it is fear, and I spell media fear H-i-l-l-a-r-y.

Who's down for a tuna sandwich?



262 posted on 11/01/2007 5:59:42 PM PDT by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: TheMole

“It isn’t Bill Clinton, because there’s nothing more he could do in the smut area that would be that newsworthy. The most likely reason they haven’t run it is fear, and I spell media fear H-i-l-l-a-r-y.”

I disagree. Bill being caught in yet another sleazy, perverted scandal is a significant news story and a liability to Mrs. SinkEmporer.

According to Emmett Tyrell Jr., the SinkEmporer has been on a sex addict rampage since he left office. It didn’t really matter when he was overseas most of the time and Hillary(!) was biding her time in the senate. But as the primaries become imminent, the fact that Hillary(!) is married to an impeached serial/philander/sexual harasser becomes more important. Everyone knows what a dirty old man Bill is—it’s common knowledge. I do think most voters respect the office of the President enough to not want the next First Spouse to be a sex-addicted philandering slut.


267 posted on 11/02/2007 3:25:57 PM PDT by RooRoobird20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson