No, but scaring conservatives into voting for a liberal RINO candidate, aka Rudy, is the very obvious intent of the article. No one, not even Hillary, will scare me into voting for Rudy. One is almost as scary as the other AFAIC. As for the article itself, I don't give any more credibility to the toesucker than I do to the Clintons, they're all cut from the same bolt of cloth.
I don't care what polls say at this early stage of the game. Most of the people being polled have only a vague idea of who's running, and have even less idea of what even the leading candidates' positions and records are. I believe a conservative Pub has a much better chance of beating Hillary than Rudy or any other RINO who carries the socially liberal baggage he carries, because a significant % of the socially/morally conservative segment of the GOP base will vote 3rd party or stay home if he's the nominee.
I won't stay home but I won't vote for either Hillary or Rudy, the slightly lesser of two evils is still evil. I'm 70 years old and have never voted for a Democrat or a liberal of any party since the 1960 JFK vs Nixon election. I'm not going to start compromising with the demonic evils of social/moral liberalism at this late date and time.
*************
I had the same impression; that this is a pro-Giuliani piece disguised as an anti-Hillary piece.