Hillary - since they MUST protect her.
Lesbian/homosexual live-in lover? It would titillate millions, but would it GAIN votes from anybody but her existing Rosie/West Hollywood/New York fashion voters?
No.
Hillary being a lesbian is repulsive to most voters (though the evidence woiuld IMMEDIATELY get billions of Internet hits!) and the “lover” would become famous/infamous - but HILLARY would gain no votes and no influence.
Now.... If Hillary! were attractive, the case would be different. She WOULD gain the Paris-Lindsey-Brittney younger voters would vote their gonads and not their brains.... But Hillary is a repulsive, ugly old hag. (Janet Reno in lesbian drag) and so exposing Hillary! as a lesbian is NOT going to get her votes in her core, audience = sing;e young women.
There are only two people in this world the MSM would sit on a story to protect: Ted Kennedy and hillary. Ted’s not running, so it must be hillary. Which brings up an interesting scenario: Bill Clinton spending his time fending off hillary’s bimbo eruptions. Hunting them down one by one. And don’t you know she had as many as he did.
Good points.
I’m astonished that nothing leaked anywhere, especially to Drudge. That could be a clue pointing to Hillary.
If it were Hillary, though, they wouldn’t have come out saying we have a story, but..........
OTOH, I don’t know if the MSM has the brass to challenge the Clintons on anything. The Clintons would have preempted or floated some rumors about the writer(s). So far, we heard nothing.