I mean there’s an exception for rape. An exception for generic “health.” (And guess who gets to define “health”?—that’s right, the abortionist). How can a supposed 'true' church advocate the murder of the unborn for ANY reason, if anything if you believe in the 'healing' powers of Christ then any raped, incest-ed, or molested female can overcome the trauma thru 'forgiveness' not through the shedding of innocent blood. Sounds like the Mormon apostles could use another 'revelation' in this matter.
Sounds like the Mormon apostles could use another 'revelation' in this matter. Oh, I'm sure they'll get a new revelation, when - and only when it politically expedient. Kinda like this post on another site regarding Mitts Mormonism and if it will effect his nomination:
Forget the underwear, Kolob, Jesus' bro Satan, temple oaths, Native Americans are Jews, the BoM is an actual history of the Americas, his contributions to the Jesus Mall, polygamy, golden plates, etc. If he's the nominee, then ONE issue alone will kill his run and that is Blacks and the priesthood. He was 31 years old when the ban was lifted in 1978. That means that for a good portion of his adult life he believed that Blacks were inferior. And he may still believe that he's more "valiant" because he's white and delightsome, unlike Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Arabs (incl. Muslims), and Native Americans.
It's still softball right now. When the big ammo kicks in he won't be able to explain this issue away. If he didn't believe that people of color were inferior during his adult life before the ban was lifted, then why did he remain a member? Why did he sustain countless leaders that held/hold that position? Why didn't he counsel members that this wasn't the case when he was a bishop and stake president? The voting public will equate these beliefs with that of a KKK. Especially after his opposition is done with him.
The Dems want Romney like the GOP wants Hillary. It'll be interesting if he gets the nod. But I don't see it happening.