To: neverdem
Great read but the problem here is what the author defines as “least common denominators”. These were the ideas that, at a bare minimum, qualified as conservative in nature; they’re distinctively small-l libertarian ideas. But what of the, to keep the inaccurate math analogy going, greatest common factors? I’ve discussed issues with some conservatives where, in my opinion, their desire to control behavior sounded Talibanish-like. And where is global commerce in this piece? Why was that issue excluded?
9 posted on
10/28/2007 1:17:25 PM PDT by
LowCountryJoe
(I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
To: LowCountryJoe
Ive discussed issues with some conservatives where, in my opinion, their desire to control behavior sounded Talibanish-like.There are left and right wing statists in both parties. Look at Rudy, a control freak if ever there was one.
And where is global commerce in this piece? Why was that issue excluded?
A lot of the base has been harmed by free trade and globalization. I've seen a lot of talk about fair trade.
16 posted on
10/28/2007 1:46:03 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
To: LowCountryJoe
Pro-capitalism and rights to property as necessary to a free society are two biggies the writer overlooked.
40 posted on
10/29/2007 12:41:33 PM PDT by
Delacon
(“The attempt to make heaven on earth invariably produces hell” Karl Popper)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson