Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
Hard not to notice that cutting Government Spending is not mentioned.

The "New" Conservatives have no problems with big spending and big deficits. I miss the old days.

6 posted on 10/28/2007 1:01:18 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Doe Eyes

This is because conservatives of today are still trying to win the argument that lowering taxes — to some so-called optimal point — generates more revenue to the government over time. We should have won the arguement by now so that are next objective could be met: further lower taxes below the optimum point so that government has less to spendand grow with!


12 posted on 10/28/2007 1:28:29 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Doe Eyes
Hard not to notice that cutting Government Spending is not mentioned.

Read the sections on taxes and government. It can be inferred. Besides welfare reform what other specific proposals have been made in the past that cut gov't spending? Without 60 votes in the Senate, nothing is going to happen. So why shoot yourself in the foot for Election Day? Entitlement reform is where the bulk of that spending is. Look what happened to the President's attempt at Social Security.

13 posted on 10/28/2007 1:29:01 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson