Well, using the term "defect" is the first reason for me with regard to this article. The fact this exists means it's not a defect but a feature of the cosmos. What's clearly defective (or incomplete) is our current understanding of the "space-time fabric". Only the most arrogant and egotistical could have the hubris to imply that we know all there is to know about the cosmos and if we discover a feature that doesn't conform to this understanding it must be a "defect."
Do you work for Microsoft marketing?
Ditto. If (that's a big "if") there is something in that part of the Universe, its something that's simply different. Nothing in the Universe is defective in the cosmic sense. It can be different, unusual, or special. It can't be defective.