Sounds like a good plan.
Hunter and Thompson have similar plans.
Except Hunter has proven leadership in this area.
Thompson’s a good man. Hunter’s a better man.
Fred has the name recognition and the gravitas and the knowledge to be a great president. Hunter could set himself on fire and people would say, “Oh, yeah, that’s the guy that built some fence somewhere, eh?” Sad, but true. :-(
We need BOTH of these good men in office—Fred in 2008 with DH at his side as VP—then DH as President in 2012 and 2016!! :-)
Thompson-Hunter 2008!!
>> Hunter and Thompson have similar plans. Except Hunter has proven leadership in this area.
And proven ineffectiveness at running a national campaign. Not a good trait in a Presidential candidate. If they’ve got the same plan ... I’ll take the one with more than a snowball’s chance of winning this thing.
>> Thompson’s a good man. Hunter’s a better man.
I’d dispute that - but it remains irrelevant. What is indisputable is that Thompson’s garnering 10 to 20 TIMES the support of Hunter. Campaign effectiveness is an essential element of a Presidential candidate ... Hunter doesn’t pass the test.
H