By the way, choosing a candidate is not a God given right. As a matter of fact in the history of mankind it rarely happened, even if in the kingdom of Israel.
It would seem very plausible that God could offer Rudy for his purpose to fight the war or protect Americas sovereignty but because religious Americans reject him, Hillary will be their judgment.
Did you ever consider that God wanted Bush to go into Iraq in the first gulf war but because he didn't we got a President who ignored Americas enemies and we were humiliated in the world and eventually ended up with 9-11? There is no way in hell Bill should have been President. Do we want to make the same mistake again? Apparently self righteous moralist who follow Dobson do.
For the record, I like Rudy but I would prefer Fred (really Hunter).
For the record, I lived in upstate NY during Rudy's term in NYC. I seriously dislike his policies, and seriously distrust his record in a number of areas. Being from Texas, you should check into Rudy's position on the second amendment.
I find much of your last post even more ironic. You have equated a Hillary win with God's judgment on America, have cast an eye toward reading God's mind regarding Rudy being his man for running the war on terror, and yet you deplore "self righteous moralist[s]".
Self righteousness, apparently, is also in the eye of the beholder.
The only REAL difference I see in their voting records is Rudy's support for continued military action over seas. If he follows his liberal tenancies and signs on to the Democrat agenda, what will we be fighting over there for?
No... Rudy cannot win against Hillary. Too many in the South will just refuse to show up at the polls. We need someone like Thompson, Hunter, or heck... even Romney at this point... Rudy would be a sure-fire way to hand Hillary the Presidency.