To: vetsvette; All
That is unfair.
People on this thread should not be making rash comments....
I agree with Fred. It is a personal family matter.
To: Shortstop7
Fred’s an attorney. He’s familiar with motive and opportunity. There you go. This was state sponsored homocide for the benefit of a private citizen who had an interest in another person’s extermination. Life insurance.
116 posted on
10/22/2007 8:08:49 PM PDT by
floriduh voter
(Terri Ping List: 8mmmauser & I'm 4 DUNCAN HUNTER & ?????????)
To: Shortstop7
But who was her family? He had done many things that indicate a lack of interest in her well being. Was he her husband in anything except name only? Should not the right to decide not revert to her birth family? These questions was not answered to the satisfaction of many. To me it seems that given the tenuousness of the marital bond under today’s law and the absence of a written document that it is weird that the husband was given this absolute right.
129 posted on
10/22/2007 8:36:08 PM PDT by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson