Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Constitutions Grandchild

If it were Dr. Paul or the Hilda-Beast (and there were no third parties), who would you vote for (or would you vote)?


170 posted on 10/22/2007 1:45:11 PM PDT by Harrius Magnus (Pucker up Mo, and your dhimmi Leftist freaks, here comes your Jizya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Harrius Magnus
I have to have faith that it won’t come to that, but I will not cast a vote for Hillary/Bill Clinton. While I don’t think Ron Paul is the sharpest tool in the shed on the issues, I do not doubt his honesty, his patriotism, his dedication, his morality, or fiscally responsible agenda. I don’t think he uses drugs, would sell our secrets to foreign governments, would go looking for a fight. HOWEVER, (and it’s a big however)his policies on foreign affairs are simplistic and frightening. It doesn’t take much to realize that if we don’t “hang together, we’ll hang separately.” We aren’t living in a world of like-minded people anymore.

The folks who started this slug-fest in the Middle East want our hides pinned to the barn door and won’t take no for an answer. Mr. Paul is childlike in his faith that all people are basically good.

I want to be like Mr. Paul. I want the rest of the world to be happy, healthy, prosperous and good — but it isn’t reality.

Final answer, I’d vote for Ron Paul (and buy a bigger gun). I might have to use it on enemies foreign and abroad, but at least I wouldn’t have to use it against my government.

178 posted on 10/22/2007 2:15:07 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson