O’Reilly is now saying he wishes we’d left Saddam Hussein in power and Salman Pak open for training jihadists. While Hannity is using his radio and television programs to champion the most liberal candidate in party history, in a primary, against a field of infinitely more conservative candidates.
O’Reilly and Hannity are the clearest examples of how “cultural hegemony” works, and how it’s destroyed journalism (among many other things) in America. And of course, they don’t even realize it’s happening to them. Which is exactly how it’s supposed to work.
Hannity just wants a republican to win, any republican, and he thinks Rudy has the best chance of beating hillary. that is all what matters to him.
Hannity is also the kind of guy that would defend every single thing Bush does. He’s a republican loyalist because he thinks criticizing a repub is like giving in to the democrats.
I haven’t listened to Hannity in quite awhile, but has he yet explained how he can work to kill the Senate bill, get into a fight with Voinovich/Bush/McCain/Graham over Amnesty, visit the border multiple times, claim to be pro life, critisize the president for the growth of government...then turn around and support an open borders pro choice pro government growth republican when there are other conservative options...and still call himself an intellectually honest conservative?
Sean’s no all bad. But he’s sending out a duel minded message here.