Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anymouse

And shame on you for planning and scheming to vote for a murderer of helpless innocent babies.


557 posted on 10/20/2007 9:40:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson; anymouse
It's pretty hard to defend murdered human beings against terrorism.
560 posted on 10/20/2007 9:48:45 PM PDT by unspun (We are still in the end times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; All

“And shame on you for planning and scheming to vote for a murderer of helpless innocent babies.”

I consider those who sit on the sidelines or use the excuse of “states rights” to defend their inaction just as guilty. Taking of an innocent human life isn’t a medical proceedure like having a hangnail removed.

The unborn deserve the same RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS guaranteed by the US Constitution as those who are born should have.

Since Roe v. Wade came along, it’s no longer a “states rights” issue...the courts have already taken it out of their hands. That can never be used as an excuse for inaction on the issue of life.

Candidates who consistently stick up for protection of the unborn are the only ones worthy of the nomination and anything less is totally unacceptable.


593 posted on 10/20/2007 11:15:55 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Who said I was supporting any particular candidate? Let alone who you suppose I am?

Last I checked only one of the candidates is a physician (and an obstetrician at that), therefore likely to have performed an abortion - and Dr. Ron Paul claims to be pro life. The rest of the candidates, even the radial leftist pro abortion Democrats have likely never performed an abortion. Now it is possible that Hillery Clinton has had an abortion, but she has not ever claimed to have had one.

That said, radical right to lifers are doing their own cause more harm than good by alienating candidates and their supporters that are not as militant about the issue as they are. I hope that no babies were aborted, but until the law makes it illegal, it is a hard moral choice for the mother to make. Hopefully she decides to at least put it up for adoption, if she feels she can’t take care of it properly. If she does abort the baby, it is an emotional scar that she (not us) will have to live with.

If we abort freedom by staying home or voting for a losing 3rd party candidate, thus letting the radical left elect Hillery Clinton by default, we guarantee that legal abortions will continue at least another 4 years, if not much longer if Clinton gets to appoint more liberals to the Supreme Court.

737 posted on 10/21/2007 12:28:26 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson