Roody Doody says he would have no litmus test when he appoints "Constructionist judges". Isn't that a litmus test in and of itself? Furthermore, does Roody Doody even understand a real Constructionist judge would find Roe to be bad law and therefor it should absolutely be part of a litmus test?
I believe his stated intentions are nothing more than a charade.
Agreed. There is no reason to think Rudy would appoint good judges to the SCOTUS. It’s just more lies from the Rudy clan.
BUMP that!!