Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narby
And Hillary will be an order of magnitude worse.

So you would settle for some socialism to prevent more socialism. That kind of thinking has caused the GOP to align itself with the socialist party at the expense of conservatives. The result will be a more socialistic candidate with each succeding election.

What is it about winning elections that you guys don't understand?

You guys? By stating you guys your are at the very least implying if not out right admitting there is a faction of the GOP that is not conservative. That leaves only one group, socialists. That goes to the very heart of the problem with the Republican party. Don't bother to classify so called "Moderates" as a distinct group. They are socialists who want to appear they are also conservatives in order to appease and appeal to the masses.

What I do understand is that you are not winning if you are willing to sacrifice principles simply for the sake of garnering the most votes. In the end you will rue the day for having supported the very type of candidate you will oppose in the future.
375 posted on 10/20/2007 5:08:05 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: Man50D
You guys? By stating you guys your are at the very least implying if not out right admitting there is a faction of the GOP that is not conservative.

I'm talking about the posters on this thread.

386 posted on 10/20/2007 5:24:54 PM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson