To: Man50D
You fail to realize those socialist rags don't so because they realize he wouldn't stand a chance as their endorsement I'm not talking about now. I'm talking about when he was Mayor and they trashed him worse than you people are doing now. Told jokes about him on Saturday Night Live. Compared him with various dictators, etc.
Any long time enemy of the NYTimes is not a liberal.
359 posted on
10/20/2007 4:54:43 PM PDT by
narby
To: narby
",,,,and they trashed him worse than you people are doing now."Since when did discussing and highlighting a liberal's leanings, policies, values and principles--and his VERY OWN WORDS--become 'trashing'???
What day did that become 'trashing'?
And who determined that discussing FACTS--is 'trashing'?....lol
363 posted on
10/20/2007 4:59:07 PM PDT by
stockstrader
(We need a conservative who will ENERGIZE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
To: narby
I'm not talking about now.
Now you are contradicting yourself ! Nowhere in your statement do your refer back to him as Mayor. you merely expressed it as a contingency or possibility. Your statement in post #257 is as follows:
If Rudy was a socialist, then socialists such as the NYTimes and Hollywood would support him.
Once again you confuse facts with trashing. There are many others in the GOP who are in the same deep state of denial as you if that provides you any comfort.
388 posted on
10/20/2007 5:27:54 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson