Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grunthor
Two words...Ted Olson. I believe him...

The conundrum for the hair-on-fire right is going to be when Rudy swerves right if and when he wins the nomination...

Rudy was asked the question, by the way. He stipulated that he would appoint strict constructionist judges. There were no ifs, ands or buts in the answer. He may be a lot of things, but, based on his statements and positions, a liar isn't one of them.

Of course, the Hard (-headed) right will choose to disbelieve him to bolster their own argument.

121 posted on 10/20/2007 12:45:20 PM PDT by sofaman (Ahmadinejad: Those who attempt to rewrite history are probably planning to repeat it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: sofaman

“Rudy was asked the question, by the way. He stipulated that he would appoint strict constructionist judges.”

He would pay for the murder of his own grand child, and even raise taxes to force US to pay for more infanticide but you think he’s got a moral hang-up against lying?


129 posted on 10/20/2007 12:53:38 PM PDT by Grunthor (http://franz.org/quiz.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson