Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: perfect_rovian_storm
At what point is a candidate’s record so abhorrent that he is unacceptable?

That's a fair question. In the general, assuming there's a DEM running against the GOP, I doubt the GOP candidate can ever be more abhorrent than the DEM candidate, so really, there's probably no limit. I thought GWB was pretty incompetent, but I voted for him. Even after he'd peed all over the Constitution.

In the primary, one should pick the candidate they like the best. I can't see how any conservative can pick Fred over Hunter on that score. Why pick a first amendment desecrater like Fred (CFR) when you can have a solid conservative? Splain me that?

77 posted on 10/20/2007 2:17:19 PM PDT by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

Hunter didn’t run a good enough campaign and didn’t appeal to enough conservative voters. It’s as simple as that.

A lot of Hunter folks spent more time on FreeRepublic trying to tear down Fred Thompson than they did actually going out and trying to promote their candidate.

Hunter also didn’t manage to work in the right places at the right time to win the nomination. He hasn’t behaved like a serious candidate.

I’ll be picking Fred over Hunter, because Hunter hasn’t proven to me that he has any of the necessary traits to get his agenda enacted. Also, I don’t agree with much of his protectionist rhetoric.


82 posted on 10/20/2007 3:10:06 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson