Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema
I'm reading it for the second time now.

I believe it is a fantastic book even though I do not agree with everything she says or her philosophy of objectivism.
5 posted on 10/19/2007 6:42:28 AM PDT by IronKros (The pig put foot. Grunt. Foot in what? ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: IronKros
I believe it is a fantastic book even though I do not agree with everything she says or her philosophy of objectivism.

Her egotism comes directly from John Locke and Thomas Hobbes...

What Rand failed to recognize:

Morality and all of its associated ideals are rooted entirely in the presupposition some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior.

Plato’s Euthyphro is a great illustration. Socrates advances the argument to Euthyphro that, piety to the gods, who all want conflicting devotions and/or actions from humans, is impossible. (Socrates exposed the pagan esoteric sophistry.)

Likewise, morals are such a construction of idols used by the Left as a rationale for them to demand compliance to their wishes in politics, which most often are a skewed mess of fallacies in logic. Morals are a deceptive replacement for the avoidance of sin.

There can be no morality without one singular source defining what it is.

9 posted on 10/19/2007 6:55:50 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson