Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eraser2005

Toyotas were never “rock solid” reliable.. most of that was crap and manipulation. Like Toyota would not issue a formal recall, but do them under different names so it wouldn’t show up in their statitistics when evaluated etc..


13 posted on 10/16/2007 10:40:41 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
Toyotas were never “rock solid” reliable.. most of that was crap and manipulation. Like Toyota would not issue a formal recall, but do them under different names so it wouldn’t show up in their statitistics when evaluated etc..

Well, in anecdotal evidence, supplied by myself, the 2 Toyota Corollas I've owned (a 1990 and a 2000) have been, by far, the most reliable cars I've ever owned. My 1990 only had 1 non-maintenance repair in 10 years, and 197,000 miles: And it was a freak. The exhaust manifold cracked (at about 125,000 miles), and blew exhaust on the radiator, ruining it. Other than replacing the manifold and radiator, no repairs.

I didn't really want to get rid of the car, but the maintenance repairs at 197,000 miles was just going to be too much to justify spending on a 10 year old car. It was still getting about 34MPG, burned about 1/2 quart of oil every 3000 miles, and was rust free. However at that point it needed a new clutch, timing belt, brakes, new front end, tires, shocks, struts, and a major tune-up. So, I traded it in on a new 2000 Corolla. In 143,000 miles and 7 years, it's needed a new module, which was covered under warranty. That's it.

Mark

111 posted on 10/16/2007 3:43:23 PM PDT by MarkL (Listen, Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson