To: blam
Blam, sorry to see that more of your good science threads are lately being ruined by unthinking anti-science dogma than by any other cause.
That behavior makes even the Helen Thomas pictures look respectable.
30 posted on
10/15/2007 9:49:51 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
lol- since hwne is Acromegally ‘anti-science’? It would seem that ignoring hte obvious implications of skulls that carry acromegally traits would be antiscience’ - but meh- suggesting that one do a thorough investigation even if it doesn’t fit hte dogma of evolution is apparently ‘antiscience’ lol You’re not by any chance suggesting ancient creatures didn’t have pituitarys and pit conditions are you?
31 posted on
10/15/2007 9:55:27 PM PDT by
CottShop
To: Coyoteman; blam
At one time they more or less obeyed the unwritten rule that GGG threads were off limits. They fought the evo/crevo wars elsewhere and left us to do our own little thing here. I’d like to see a return to that.
37 posted on
10/16/2007 11:02:55 AM PDT by
colorado tanker
(I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson