Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
Blam, sorry to see that more of your good science threads are lately being ruined by unthinking anti-science dogma than by any other cause.

That behavior makes even the Helen Thomas pictures look respectable.

30 posted on 10/15/2007 9:49:51 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

lol- since hwne is Acromegally ‘anti-science’? It would seem that ignoring hte obvious implications of skulls that carry acromegally traits would be antiscience’ - but meh- suggesting that one do a thorough investigation even if it doesn’t fit hte dogma of evolution is apparently ‘antiscience’ lol You’re not by any chance suggesting ancient creatures didn’t have pituitarys and pit conditions are you?


31 posted on 10/15/2007 9:55:27 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman; blam
At one time they more or less obeyed the unwritten rule that GGG threads were off limits. They fought the evo/crevo wars elsewhere and left us to do our own little thing here. I’d like to see a return to that.
37 posted on 10/16/2007 11:02:55 AM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson