Hmmm...kind of tough to answer that though. As all elections have another person running (at least in the Pres. election). So if the choice is between less evil vs. more evil...I guess I'll vote less evil.
Let's take abortion since it's the topic at hand. If Rudy wanted to increase abortions and thought it was the best way to improve the lot of poor people. And Hillary just wanted to leave it as an option but would fund programs to help reduce the amount of them...then yes I'd stay home. The reason being i that the guy I agree with on most issues is more wrong on the most important issue. but if he's got the same view as Hillary or a little bit less extreme view...then I'd still vote for him.
I do understand that reasoning, but it still isn’t my point. So I guess I have to get hypothetical. Note: these aren’t asked pugnaciously, I really am going somewhere with it.
So, if both candidates favored legalizing rape, you’d vote for the GOP candidate?
If both favored legalizing child molestation, you’d vote for the GOP candidate?
If both favored giving all power to the imams in Iran, you’d vote for the GOP candidate?