Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why conservatives should condemn Ann Coulter (vanity)
Vanity | October 12, 2007 | ChicagoHebrew

Posted on 10/12/2007 3:26:26 PM PDT by ChicagoHebrew

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 last
To: grey_whiskers

“If she *is* a professing Christian I hope she wouldn’t be openly engaging in premarital sex.”

I don’t know whether or not you’re joking, but I’m really having a hard time imagining Ann as a 46 year old virgin. Of course anything is possible, but I somehow doubt it.


161 posted on 10/13/2007 8:59:41 AM PDT by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Crim
I'm just suprised she's falling short of her stated standards.

(Not at all surprised that any eligible man would be interested in her, however.)

Cheers!

162 posted on 10/13/2007 9:10:15 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Crim
and if you think they aint doin the nasty...grow up.

So, given the topic of this thread, she *is* trying to convert Jewish people then ("missionary position")

Cheers!

163 posted on 10/13/2007 9:11:38 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: merry10
Why such a cheerful quote on your FR homepage?

Cheers!

164 posted on 10/13/2007 9:13:16 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Mila
I don’t know whether or not you’re joking, but I’m really having a hard time imagining Ann as a 46 year old virgin. Of course anything is possible, but I somehow doubt it.

You'll break a lot of FReeper hears saying that ;-)

Cheers!

165 posted on 10/13/2007 9:14:35 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

I have always wondered this myself. Hope someone answers you.


166 posted on 10/13/2007 9:18:43 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoHebrew
I disagree w/ your position on Coulter for one reason:

She pokes a stick into the eye of PC. All PC, everywhere.

She gives no quarter.

She holds it up to the ridicule it deserves.

As an added benefit she drives liberals to apoplexy. How dare she speak well of Christianity, LOL.

Screw the PC police of all stripes and every single gutless wonder that supports it.

167 posted on 10/13/2007 9:24:38 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“Hey, dude — was Ann Coulter’s comment any less offensive than the one line you have on your profile page?

My fellow Americans, I have just signed legislation to outlaw Islam. The bombing began in October 2001.


I believe he is paraphrasing something that Ronald Reagan said, as a joke, in 1984.

“My fellow Americans, I’m pleased to tell you today that I’ve signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan%27s_%22We_begin_bombing_in_five_minutes%22_joke


168 posted on 10/13/2007 9:52:17 AM PDT by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I can’t believe how nasty some FReepers are. First, most of the replies are about a statement this poster said with which he had no problem (blinders?). Weird. Do some people have blinders on

You see, it's a race to see who can be the rudest and dumbest the fastest. Reading the article just takes too long.

169 posted on 10/13/2007 10:07:34 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I guess I need to see what it says!

I think I did that back in the March time frame...the last time I changed it I think.


170 posted on 10/13/2007 5:00:28 PM PDT by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: merry10

Interesting that you would be concerned about giving Republicans a bad name considering the unFRiendly phrase on your FR profile.

There have been times when Ann Coulter has made me cringe, but this isn’t one of them.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1910942/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1910707/posts


171 posted on 10/13/2007 8:26:56 PM PDT by ru4liberty (Who hired Craig Livingston???????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoHebrew

Ann has a right to say anything she wants just as you do.
I won’t condemn Ann Coulter anymore than I would condemn..well...you.

No one has a right “not to be offended” and these days i’m frankly offended at all the people who have such thin skin.

I personally admire Coulter and am just as sick and tired of all the anti-Coulter folks as the anti-war nuts.
Get over yourself!


172 posted on 10/13/2007 8:33:17 PM PDT by caffe (please, no more consensus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
We should feel what it's like from the radical Muslim prospective. Bletch!

I don't recall where I ever said that, or how you could infer that. However, I WAS comparing Christians to the so-called "moderate" Muslims, who never speak openly against their fanatical brethren. Except that, in this case, Christians ARE speaking out - many, surprisingly, in favor of Ann's stupid remarks. "The Jews need to be perfected by becoming Christians." Is that any different from the Muslims wanting everyone to convert to Islam? No, it isn't.

173 posted on 10/14/2007 2:13:20 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoHebrew
Well, maybe she meant that the convention was more Christian than other places she's been.

With the dangerous antisemitism on the rise on the left, in Europe, in England...when Joe Lieberman loses his party's nomination...you want to get all worked up over some remark by a Chrisitan conservative.

I don't think you're going to be able to Buchanan-ize Coulter.

174 posted on 10/14/2007 2:17:45 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
You’re in contention for stupidest post of the thread

Still telling people off huh?

You are the stupidest sneakiest poster on this board. You support those that wish to destroy this site and are unapologetic in that regard.

You have never retracted the lie that you posted about me.

As I have told you before, if you can't stand up for yourself and your slurs, then don't you think it is time to stop criticizing others?

175 posted on 10/14/2007 6:15:14 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Duke Nukum

He really doesn’t like or understand sarcasm (my youngest son says sarcasm is the finest kind of humor). BUT, as I say, I hold the remote (smile).


176 posted on 10/16/2007 6:55:46 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson