[lormand]

"President Bush is a clear and present danger to our sovereignty."

Since you are a Ron Paul fan, I automatically do not accept your premise that this treaty would empower our enemies, which puts you in a bit of a credibility crunch doesn't it? If we have no enemies as Ron Paul suggests, then a position on either way regarding this treaty in terms of "enemy threat" is a moot point right?

[hedgetrimmer]

Since you are a Ron Paul fan

Where did I say this?

I automatically do not accept your premise that this treaty would empower our enemies

Why would you be deliberately unthinking on such an important matter?

If we have no enemies as Ron PaulPresident Bush suggests by his actions, then allowing an international court to overrule our justice system is just fine, and allowing an international committee to control the seabed is peachy-- apparently this is your view.

We can surmise from your post, that those most vehemently opposed to pro american presidential candidates are internationalists, and they don't want the looting of American sovereignty and of the American domestic economy to stop.